As the Presidential debates ended on a late October evening, I pondered much of what I had heard in all of the debates. I have questions in my mind -- none of which are particularly political.
The stress is on creating jobs. My concern is that the world has changed considerably. The jobs that will be created will most likely be jobs that require technical skills. No matter how we spin things, there are still many Americans who do not have the basic intelligence to learn the skills required for these technical jobs. In the 1950's through the 1980's, there were good jobs in manufacturing, municipalities, construction and utilities which provided health insurance, pensions, and security to people who had limited intelligence, but were willing to work loyally every day at mundane jobs. Obviously, this is no longer the case. What is to happen to these people who are willing to work diligently, but do not possess the basic intelligence to compete in our high-tech world?
I also question -- and this is a controversial view -- who has the right to determine which countries can develop and possess nuclear weapons. Personally, I strongly oppose nuclear weapons, as well as nuclear energy, due to their capability to annihilate life as we know it. But, I wonder why we are so determined that Iran not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons, yet we seem to be fine with Pakistan possessing nuclear capabilities. Please don't misconstrue my question as being in any way supportive of Iran -- I just wonder what gives the more powerful nations of the world the right to decide it is okay for some nations to possess nuclear capabilities and not okay for other nations.
During the debates there was much discussion about the Arab Spring uprisings. It seems like we heartily encourage all nations, particularly those in the Middle East, to rise up against totalitarian governments and create democracies. However, we are unhappy if the electorate chooses leaders who do not meet our standards. It seems to me that either we support the democratic process or we don't. Who are we to choose what is best for the citizens of another country?
These are complicated questions, and, as I said, not directed at either party or candidate. I would be interested in hearing others' opinions on them, as I find them perplexing.